chapter 7

Paying for Local Government


Local government services and programs cost money. Cities and counties have to pay the people who work for them. Local governments must also provide the buildings, equipment, and supplies for conducting public business. They must pay for public services they buy from businesses or community groups. In North Carolina local government services and programs cost billions of dollars each year. In 2001, North Carolina county governments spent more than $9.3 billion, and North Carolina cities and towns spent more than $6.8 billion to provide services for the people of North Carolina.

Within limits set by the state, local officials are responsible for deciding what to spend for local government and how to raise the money to cover those expenses. This chapter focuses on these issues.

A budget is a plan for raising and spending money. North Carolina law requires each city and each county to adopt an annual budget every year, including planned expenditures and revenues for the following year.

The State of North Carolina sets very strict requirements that local governments must follow in managing their money. That was not always so. During the 1920s many cities and counties in the state borrowed heavily. When the stock market crashed in 1929 and thousands of people lost their jobs, many local governments went even more heavily into debt. By 1931, the state's local governments were spending half of their property tax revenues each year on debt payments. More than half of the state's cities and counties were unable to pay their debts at some time during the Great Depression of the 1930s.

To restore sound money management to local government, the General Assembly created the North Carolina Local Government Commission and passed a series of laws regulating local government budgeting and finance. The Local Government Commission enforces those laws and with the Institute of Government of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill provides training and advice to local government budget and finance officers.

State regulation provides a strong framework for sound money management. But local officials still have primary responsibility for using city and county funds wisely and well. During the past 50 years, North Carolina local governments have established a national reputation for managing public money carefully and providing the public with good value for their dollars.

BUDGETING

In North Carolina, local government budgets must be balanced. That is, the budget must indicate that the local government will have enough money during the year to pay for all the budgeted expenditures. Expenditures can be paid either from money received during the year (revenue) or from money already on hand at the beginning of the year (fund balance). A balanced budget can be represented by the following equation:

Expenditures = Revenues + Fund Balance Withdrawals

Thus, if a local government plans to spend $1 million, it must have a total of $1 million in revenues and fund balance. If it plans to raise only $900,000 in revenue, it needs to be able to withdraw $100,000 from the fund balance. If it plans to raise $950,000, it will need to draw only $50,000 from the fund balance.

The fund balance is like the local government's savings account. It helps the government deal with unexpected situations. Local government revenues are discussed later in the chapter. However, it is important to note here that the budget is based on revenue estimates—educated guesses about how much money the city or county will receive during the coming year. To be safe, local officials usually plan to spend nothing from the fund balance. That is, they budget expenditures equal to estimated revenues. Then, if actual revenues are less than expected, they can withdraw from the fund balance to make up the difference. If revenues exceed actual expenditures, the money is added to the fund balance. If a government regularly withdraws from its fund balance, it will eventually use all its savings and have no "rainy day" money left.

Deciding What to Spend

In North Carolina, annual budgets run from July 1 of one calendar year to June 30 of the following calendar year. This period is called the government's fiscal year because it is the year used in accounting for money. ("Fisc" is an old word for treasury.) "Fiscal year" is often abbreviated "FY." FY 2002, for example, means the fiscal year from July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2002. Each year the local governing board must adopt the annual budget before the new fiscal year begins on July 1.

Several months before the fiscal year begins, each local government department estimates how much more or less their services will cost in the coming year. For example, if a solid waste collection department is going to continue collecting the same amount of waste from the same number of places at the same frequency, its costs will be about the same. Fuel for the trucks may cost a little more, but if services do not change, next year's expenditures should be quite similar to this year's expenditures. (Raises for employees are often considered separately from department estimates. They will be discussed later.)

If, in the example, the city council decides to reduce the number of trash collections from twice a week to once a week, the department can reduce the number of employees and the number of miles driven by the trucks. The department will pay less in salaries and fuel bills and perhaps not have to buy replacement trucks as often. The change in services will therefore reduce estimated expenditures for the department.

On the other hand, if the city plans to annex several neighborhoods, the department may need to add trucks and crews to collect solid waste there. These new expenses for additional service will add to estimated expenditures for the department.

After department heads determine how much they think they will need for the next fiscal year, they discuss these estimates with the manager. The manager also looks at expected changes in the other expenditures. For example, health insurance premiums for employees might be expected to increase. Or, employees' salaries might need to be raised so the local government can stay competitive with private employers. In addition to department requests, the manager must add increases that affect all departments.

At the same time, the manager also prepares revenue estimates for the coming year. After all the estimates for both expenditures and revenues are complete, the manager compares the totals. If estimated revenues exceed estimated expenditures, the manager may recommend lowering local tax rates, adding to the fund balance, or beginning new programs and services. If estimated expenditures exceed revenues, the manager may recommend cutting expenditures, raising taxes or fees, or making withdrawals from the fund balance. It is the manager's responsibility to propose a balanced budget to the governing board.

The proposed budget lists the amount of money each department will spend in the coming year. It also lists the amount of money expected from each revenue source for the coming year and the amount the manager proposes to withdraw from (or add to) the fund balance.

The governing board reviews the proposed budget. With the proposed budget is information about the current year's budget, expenditures, and revenues. Council members and commissioners usually pay particularly close attention to proposed changes in spending to decide whether the services their government provides are the best use of public funds. They also pay careful attention to proposals to raise tax rates or the fees people pay for services.

Before the governing board adopts the budget, it must hold a public hearing. This provides people in the community an opportunity to express their views about the proposed budget. At any point in its review, the board can change the proposed budget. The annual budget must be adopted by a majority of the board.

In the News . . .
Entrance to the Western North Carolina Nature Center
Photo by Tony Dills / Western North Carolina Nature Center
The Nature Center was one of several parks and recreation facilities considered for improvements by the Buncombe County Commissioners.
Funding Will Determine How County
Addresses Recreation Needs
By Julie Ball

Replacement of the Erwin pool, renovations at Owen Park and improvements to the WNC Nature Center are at the top of Buncombe County's list of recreation needs, but just how quickly those needs are addressed will depend on funding.

"It all depends on funding," said Recreation Services Director Annette Wise.

Wise presented the county's recreation needs to county commissioners during a recent retreat.

The Recreation Services Department plans to seek increases in fees at the Nature Center, pools, golf course and for Aston Park memberships, but the increases are designed to cover growing operational costs, not capital needs, according to Wise.

Wise said she hopes the county can get grant money to help pay for some of these projects. "I think a lot of our projects are going to require federal grants," she said.

The most pressing needs are replacing the Erwin pool and renovations at Owen Park. The Erwin pool is in desperate need of replacing, according to Wise.

"We're hoping we can get through this summer. It's debatable now," Wise said. "The winter really took its toll on that pool. If there isn't a leak under the pool, we can open."

The pool is 25 years old—the oldest of the county-run pools. The cost of replacing the pool and decking is estimated at $900,000. Another $400,000 is needed for improvements to Owen Park.

The needs at Owen include replacing the lighting system, fence work and drainage.

County manager Wanda Greene said those crucial projects will get first priority, and the county will do its best to fund the Erwin pool and Owen projects in the upcoming budget.

"We see the Erwin pool as a 'have to'," she said.

The Recreation Services Department also wants to make improvements to the Nature Center to address parking problems and a growing need for classroom space, but those projects may require other funding sources.

The amusement rides that have been a tradition at Recreation Park have been sold, and Wise said there are plans to redo the park. Plans include adding a large playground, adding a "kiddie water park" near the Rec Park pool and adding a Nature Center visitor center.

The Nature Center gift shop would move into the visitor center. There would also be space for traveling exhibits and possibly an area for Nature Center visitors to eat.

Initial Nature Center projects are expected to cost between $5 million and $7 million.

"It's a wonderful thing to have, but it's not as high a priority," Greene said.

Eventually, Wise said Recreation Services officials want to tackle several other projects including improvements at Lake Julian, renovations at the Skyland Recreation Center, improvements at the golf course and adding parking at Aston Park.

"Those projects may be a bit further away," Wise said.

Long-range goals also call for adding an athletic park in the Erwin district.

—Reprinted by permission of
Asheville Citizen-Times News
February 8, 2001

Spending Public Funds

In adopting the budget, the governing board formally appropriates the expenditures. That is, the board authorizes spending the amount to be spent for each department during the coming fiscal year. The finance officer keeps records of all expenditures. Before each bill is paid during the year, the finance officer checks to see that there is enough money left in the department's appropriation to pay that bill. Expenditure records also help the manager coordinate government operations and, as we have seen, help in planning the next year's budget. If the government needs to spend more than the amount listed in the budget for a particular purpose, the council (or commission) must pass a budget amendment.

Each local government's budget reflects the choice of services the local governing board has made. Local government budgets also reflect the way the General Assembly has allocated service responsibilities. Most municipalities spend much of their money on utilities, public safety, and streets. Most counties spend a majority of their money on education and human services.

Figures 7.1 and 7.2 show how North Carolina local governments spent their money in the 2000-2001 fiscal year. (The most recent figures and additional detail can be found on the state treasurer's web site at ncdst-web2.treasurer.state.nc.us/lgc/units/unitlistjs.htm.)

Local governments that borrow money to build new facilities must repay what they have borrowed—the principal—plus interest. Typically, these payments are spread over several years. These payments are called debt service. Debt service is often part of local government budgets, for reasons discussed in the following section.

Figure 7.1 Total Expenditures of North Carolina's Municipalities- Fiscal Year 2000-2001

Pie chart of municipal expenditures

Total expenditures: $6,880,523,858

Utilities (37%) includes water, sewer, electric, and gas services operated by municipal governments.
Debt service (10%) includes both principal and interest.
Streets/transportation (11%) includes street construction and repair, traffic signals, buses, and airports.
General government (7%) includes the central administration and support for all municipal services.
Public safety (18%) includes police, fire, emergency communications, emergency medical services, animal control, and building inspections.
Other (17%) includes economic development; parks, recreation and other cultural programs; environmental protection; and all the other services of municipal government.
(Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.)

Source:  North Carolina Department of the State Treasurer

Figure 7.2  Total Expenditures of North Carolina's Counties - Fiscal Year 2000-2001

Pie chart of county expenditures

Total expenditures: $9,327,450,614

Education (32%) includes the counties' contributions to the public schools and community colleges.
Debt service (8%) includes both principal and interest.
Human services (27%) includes public health, mental health, and social services.
General government (8%) includes the central administration and support for all county services.
Public safety (13%) includes sheriff, jail, fire, emergency communications, emergency medical services, animal control, and building inspections.
Other (13%) includes economic development, parks, recreation, libraries and other cultural programs, environmental protection, and all the other services of county government.
(Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.)

Source:  North Carolina Department of the State Treasurer

CAPITAL PROJECTS

When a city buys land for a new park or a county builds a new jail or landfill, the project usually costs too much to be paid for from current revenues or from fund balance. Major purchases like land or buildings are called capital projects. Local governments usually borrow money to finance large capital projects, although annual revenues or fund balance may be sufficient for small projects.

Borrowing has several disadvantages. Borrowing money is expensive. The borrower (in this case, the city or county) must pay interest to the lender. Borrowing also commits the government to payments on the debt for a period of years, often 20 or more. Debt service payments will need to be included as expenses in each annual budget until the debt is paid off.

However, borrowing for capital projects also has advantages. One advantage is that by borrowing, the government can do the project right away. A new landfill or jail may be needed very soon, much sooner than the government would be able to save enough money to pay for the project. Another advantage to starting the project right away is that the costs of land and construction may go up while the government waits for funds to become available. While costs go up, the value of the dollar may go down due to inflation. Inflation helps the borrower, however. Because of inflation, the dollars the government pays back may be worth quite a bit less than the dollars the government borrowed several years earlier. Borrowing for capital projects also places responsibility for paying for the project on those who will use it. Capital projects have many years of useful life. Borrowing spreads out paying for the project over many of those years.

Governments borrow money by issuing bonds. Two kinds of bonds are used by North Carolina cities and counties. General obligation (G.O.) bonds pledge the "faith and credit" of the government. That is, the local government agrees to use tax money if necessary to repay the debt. Bondholders can even require local governments to raise taxes if that is necessary to pay the debt. Revenue bonds are repaid from revenues the project itself generates. Thus, if a parking deck is built with revenue bonds, the debt is repaid with revenues from fees paid by those who park in the deck.

Under the North Carolina constitution, G.O. bonds cannot be issued unless a majority of the voters approve. A referendum must be held to allow voters to approve or reject all G.O. bonds proposed by city councils or boards of commissioners. G.O. bonds are typically used for nonrevenue-producing projects like schools, courthouses, parks, or jails. Sometimes government officials also prefer to use G.O. bonds for revenue-producing projects like sewer plants, parking decks, or convention centers. This is because G.O. bonds usually have a lower interest rate than revenue bonds. Investors feel more secure about the repayment of their money when a bond is backed by local government's power to tax.

In the News . . .

Bond Advisory Group Begins Sorting Through Recommendations
By Virginia Knapp

It doesn't have dashing good looks or sex appeal, but it's guaranteed to be fought over and possibly attacked. Call it bond, county bond.

The Capital Needs Advisory Task Force meets to start the process of putting about $72 million in bonds before Orange County voters in November for a thumbs-up or thumbs-down.

The Orange County commissioners have charged the 28-member task force with recommending where funds should go and how much should be placed on the ballot.

"It's not just people bringing their own opinions, but it is also people listening to the community at large," task force member Bill Waddell said about the process of determining needs.

Waddell, who also was on the 1997 task force, said that past task forces have easily found a range of capital needs throughout the county.

A sample scenario for the November bond referendum suggests that those needs could include two elementary schools for the city school district, a middle school for the county school district, two senior centers, money for justice facilities and a community college, funds for parks and open space, and affordable housing initiatives.

Orange County's finance and budget directors already have warned that the county can only take on about $72 million in new debt.

How the pie is divided will be up to the task force to recommend, the commissioners to place on the ballot and the voters to decide.

In 1992, county voters passed a $52 million bond referendum for school funding—$36 million for the city schools and $16 million for the county district.

In 1993, a $5 million bond for farmland preservation and purchase of development rights failed.

In 1997, four out of five proposed bonds were approved. In a $60.6 million package, $47 million went for the schools, $6.1 million for parks, $1.8 million for affordable housing and $1.2 million for sewer expansion in Efland. A $4.6 million referendum to raise money for improvements to county buildings and senior centers failed.

Some of the results from the spending can be seen. The 1992 funds built McDougle Middle and East Chapel Hill High schools in the city district and A.L. Stanback Middle School in the county district.

In 1997, funds were allocated to build Smith Middle School, an addition to East Chapel Hill High, Pathways Elementary and half the cost of Cedar Ridge High School. Only the bond for Cedar Ridge High School has not been sold yet.

Money also was divvied up for renovations at six Orange County schools, four of the eight city elementaries, Philips Middle and Chapel Hill High.

Assistant County Manager Rod Visser said that $2.8 million of the $6.1 million bond for parks and open space has been sold to help fund projects. The $1.2 million for the Efland sewer project has not yet been spent and $700,000 of the $1.8 million for affordable housing has been committed to projects, Visser said.

—Excerpted by permission of
The Chapel Hill News
March 14, 2001


Here are the results of the November 2001 bond referendum, referenced in the preceding article:
Orange County Bond Referendum Results - November 6, 2001
Purpose of Bond Order Bond Amount
Yes Votes
(Votes

in Favor of
the Order)
No Votes
(Votes

Against
the Order
)
School Bonds
Bonds for Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
Bonds for Senior Centers
Bonds for Low and Moderate Income Housing
$47,000,000
$20,000,000
$4,000,000
$4,000,000
11,868
10,915
10,762
10,441
8,179
8,988
9,080
9,482

The installment-purchase agreement is an alternative to borrowing that some governments use. Under this arrangement, someone else (a business or a civic group) builds or buys the facility the government needs. The government then gets to use the facility in return for an annual payment. Unlike rental agreements, however, in this kind of contract, the government is actually buying the property through its payments. Governments can not pledge their taxing power when entering into installment-purchase agreements. The debt is backed by the property being purchased. If the government fails to complete its payments, the facility belongs to those who are leasing it to the government.

REVENUES

Local governments get most of their money from taxes, user fees and charges, and funding from other governments. There are also several smaller revenue sources, including interest the government earns on its fund balance. The local economy and decisions of state and federal governments play a major part in local government funding. Local officials have only a few ways to increase the amount of revenue their local government receives.

Local Taxes

The property tax is the most important local tax. Property taxes are often the largest single source of revenue for a local government, sometimes providing more than half of all revenues. The property tax is based on the assessed valueof property.

Assessing establishes the value of property for tax purposes. Real property (land and the buildings and other improvements on it) is reassessed every eight years, although some counties do so more often. Personal property(cars, trucks, business equipment) is reassessed each year. According to North Carolina law, tax assessments are supposed to be at the fair market value of the property. That is, the assessed value should equal the likely sale price of the property. If a property owner thinks an assessed value is too high, he or she may appeal it to the county commissioners when they meet as the "board of equalization and review."

In the News . . .

County Okays Tax Plan
By Johnny Whitfield

Mitchell County residents are getting closer to finding out how the county will value their land for tax purposes over the next eight years.

County commissioners gave their okay to preliminary assessments after tax assessor Mike Robinson gave the board a 90-minute presentation on how the values were arrived at.

The biggest bone of contention, Robinson said, will probably revolve around the assessments placed on values for land used in mining.

In prior revaluations, mining land was valued as timber land, but Robinson said state law allows local governments to value property based on the value of their mineral deposits and their status as land still to be mined.

According to Robinson, some of that land will increase in value from $1,200 per acre to more than $43,000 per acre.

"We've worked with the mining industries to determine what land is currently being mined and how they generate income from that land," Robinson said.

But he added that the formula on which the land values are based is defensible in court.

"We believe we could go to court and win a court case if it comes down to it," Robinson said.

With the formula for determining land values approved, residents have until February 5 to review the process before public hearing on the matter.

As for residential and commercial properties, Robinson said the tax office and Sabre Systems, the company hired to complete the revaluation, used a combination of market values and replacement costs to determine property values on those tracts of land.

The properties were also valued based, in part, on the neighborhood in which they are located.

Robinson said that was a necessary part of the process, because property in Buladean, for instance, doesn't bring as much in a sale, as land in Swiss Pine Lake subdivision.

"You can look at any map of the sales that have taken place in the last two and half or three years and tell that land values aren't the same," Robinson said.

Commissioners questioned Robinson on how neighborhoods were grouped and how land in the adjacent neighborhoods with differing characteristics was valued.

Robinson told commissioners that they were about to embark on one of the most dangerous political tasks they are assigned as commissioners.

"You will get more phone calls and more visits from people about this one issue than anything else you will be asked to do as commissioners," Robinson said.

—Excerpted by permission of
The Mitchell News-Journal
January 23, 2001

Economic development increases the value of property in a city or county, thereby increasing its property tax base. New real estate developments are assessed as they are completed, so they immediately add to a jurisdiction's total assessed value. Unless there is new construction, however, real property is reassessed only every eight years in most counties. The market value of property may change a great deal during the eight years between reassessments.

The property tax rate is the amount of tax due for each $100 of assessed value. If a house and lot are valued at $100,000 and the property tax rate is $.90 per $100, the tax due on the property will be $900.

$100,000  = 1,000 $.90 X 1,000 = $900
$100

The property tax is one of the few sources of revenue the local governing board can influence directly. For that reason, setting the property tax rate is often the last part of budget review. To set the rate, local officials must first determine how much the city or county needs to raise in property taxes to balance the budget. All other estimated revenues are added together. That figure is subtracted from the total expenses the local government plans to have. The balance is the amount that must be raised through property taxes.

To set the property tax rate, the amount which the government must raise through property taxes is divided by the total assessed value of property in the jurisdiction. That gives the amount of tax which needs to be raised for each dollar of assessed value. To get the tax rate per $100 of assessed value, we multiply by 100. For example, if a city has a total assessed value of $500 million and needs to raise $4 million from property taxes, its property tax rate would be $.80 per $100 of assessed valuation.

$400,000,000  = .008 $.008 X 1,000 = $.80
$500,000,000

The higher the assessed value of taxable property, the lower the tax rate needed to produce a given amount of revenue. If the assessed value of property in our example above were $600 million, the city could raise $4 million from property taxes with a property tax rate of only $.67 per $100 of assessed value.

The property tax rate for the next fiscal is set by the local governing board when it adopts the annual budget. Sometimes there is considerable controversy over raising the property tax rate. Many people are quite aware of the property tax. Property owners get a bill from the local tax collector for the entire amount each year. Thus, people know exactly how much they pay in local property tax. (In contrast, the sales tax is collected a few pennies or a few dollars at a time. Most people lose track of how much they pay in sales tax.) Also, the connection between the property tax and the services government provides may be difficult to see. After all, people get public services all year long, but the property tax bill comes only once a year.

Most property owners pay their taxes. In North Carolina, more than 95 percent of all property taxes are typically paid each year. When taxes on property are not paid, the government can go to court to take the property and order it sold to pay the tax bill.

In the News . . .

Debts due the city
Collection may improve
By Terry Calhoun

Southport city manager Rob Gandy will ask aldermen to consider participating in a state debt collection program that deducts overdue municipal payments from N. C. Department of Revenue tax refund checks.

Gandy said the city only recently learned of the availability of the debt set-off program that legislators approved in 1997. The program enables cities and counties to match-up names of those in debt to the city with those who may be receiving state income tax refunds.

Brunswick County commissioners joined the state collection program last week. County manager Marty Lawing told commissioners they could expect roughly one-third of old accounts to be settled by the method.

Any and all debts of $50 or more owed the city — personal property, boat and vehicle taxes, water, sewer and electric utility charges and other fees charged by city departments — may be handled by the revenue department.

Gandy said he will review other requirements of the program before reporting to aldermen in January.

According to audited figures made available to aldermen earlier this month, Southport taxpayers owe the city $119,691 — enough that, if all were paid today, city tax rates could be cut from the current 40 cents per $100 property valuation to 34 or 35 cents. Or, the money could be used for water and sewer improvements. Collection of delinquent water, sewer and electric payments could further benefit the city.

Alderman Paul Fisher repeatedly has encouraged city staff to more aggressively collect unpaid bills and has asked the city manager and city attorney to offer a plan to reduce the city’s accounts receivable backlog.

Although back taxes may be collected for tax years reaching back a decade, $90,000 of the Southport debt is from tax years 1998-2000. Those figures are current as of the close of the fiscal year June 30, 2001, the latest audited numbers available.

The state set-off program might go far in satisfying Fisher that the city administration is doing all it can to collect owed taxes. Cumbersome and time-consuming mortgage lien procedures seldom produce immediate results.

Among other steps, the city would have to establish a hearing procedure and name a hearing officer and notify debtors by regular mail prior to turning the debt over to a clearinghouse.

Brunswick County is expected to contract with Five Star Computing of Columbia, S. C., for administration of the program and to act as the established clearinghouse.

—Reprinted by permission of
The State Port Pilot
December 26, 2001

Property tax bills are sent out in August, early in the new fiscal year, yet no penalties for late payment are imposed until January. Therefore, most people wait until December to pay their property taxes. Local governments must pay their bills each month. They cannot wait until they have received property tax payments to pay their employees and suppliers. This is another reason the fund balance is important. Local governments need to have money on hand to pay their bills while they wait for property taxes to be paid.

In addition to the property tax, some counties and cities have been granted authority from the General Assembly to levy certain other taxes. These include taxes for the privilege of doing business, keeping a dog or other pet, or owning an automobile. More than 70 counties and a few cities have authority to levy occupancy taxes on hotel and motel rooms. A smaller number of local governments have authority to levy a tax on the price on restaurant meals or on transfer of land. The General Assembly limits the amount of these taxes, usually to a few dollars each.

State-Collected Taxes

The sales tax provides a substantial part of most local governments' revenues. State law permits each county to levy a tax of $.02 on each dollar of sales in the county, and all the counties do so. (The state levies an additional $.045 on all sales except food. The county tax applies to food, as well. Mecklenburg County has special authority to levy an additional half cent tax on sales in that jurisdiction.) Businesses collect the money from their customers each time the customer pays for a purchase. The state collects sales tax receipts from businesses throughout North Carolina and then returns the local portion of the sales tax to the counties and the municipalities within them.

Sales tax revenues are divided between county and municipal governments according to formulas established by the General Assembly. Each board of county commissioners decides whether sales tax revenues will be divided with that county's municipalities on the basis of a population formula or on the basis of the amount of taxes collected in each jurisdiction. City councils have no control over how much sales tax revenue they receive, and county commissioners can only decide whether to divide sales tax receipts with cities either according to population or according to where the tax was paid. Only the state legislature can raise the sales tax rate. Neither city nor county officials have control over how much money the sales tax produces for local government.

Because the sales tax rate is set by the General Assembly, the amount of revenue in any year depends on economic conditions. The more people spend on purchases, the greater the sales tax revenue. When the economy slows down and people buy less, sales tax revenues go down, too.

North Carolina has a separate tax on the sale of gasoline. A part of the state gasoline tax is distributed to each municipality in the state. This money, called "Powell Bill" funds, can be used only for the construction and maintenance of city streets. In FY 2001, more than $129 million dollars in Powell Bill funds were transferred from the state to North Carolina cities and towns.

Because the gasoline tax is a tax on each gallon of gasoline purchased, when gasoline prices go up and people buy less gasoline, Powell Bill funds go down. This leaves cities with less money for streets.

Cities and counties also receive money from the state for a variety of taxes on such things as sales of land, and beer and wine sales. The state also pays local governments money to replace some of the revenue lost when the state removed some property from the local tax base. Local officials have no control over these revenues, however. The General Assembly sets these tax rates and determines how the funds will be distributed.

In the News . . .

State's budget woes spill down to area towns
By Carol Pelosi

At the state level, the shortage in the state's budget is an abstract figure, $900 million or perhaps $1.1 billion.

In Rolesville, the town's share amounts to a new police car and a paved walking path around the park.

North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley is pushing part of the pain of the state's budget shortfall down to the counties and towns by holding back expected reimbursements and state-collected local revenues.

Across the state, the lack of those funds will amount to $129 million for towns and cities, in addition to about $70 million for the 100 counties.

Lee Mandell with the League of Municipalities estimated last week the impact on local towns would be

  • $384,755 for Wake Forest, about 4.5 cents on the 52-cent tax rate for the town with 12,797 residents. "That's a substantial hit for us," Manager Mark Williams said, who earlier estimated the town would lose $330,000.
  • $29,044 in Youngsville. "If we had to replace it, that would mean 5 cents on the tax rate," Town Administrator Brenda Robbins said. The town of 655 people has a 66-cent tax rate.
  • $17,619 for Rolesville with its 915 residents. The loss translates to 2.6 cents on the 48.5-cent tax rate, but Manager Don Dubay notes that other factors mean an 8.5 percent shortfall of anticipated revenues.
  • $54,203 for Franklinton, which has 1,756 residents. "It means we're not going to spend anything unless it's an emergency," Administrator Mike Morton said, adding, "We will do all safety issues." The loss of state funds amounts to 8 cents on the town's 68-cent tax rate.
  • The state is withholding inventory tax reimbursements for local taxes that were repealed several years ago. Easley withheld $95 million in these reimbursements last year but finally paid them six months later.

    In addition, the governor has ordered that the state will hold onto the utility (electric and natural gas) taxes, beer and wine taxes and homestead exemption reimbursement it collects for towns and cities.

    "We have been impacted twice," Dubay said, because sales tax revenues have dropped as well as interest rates on the town's investments.

    Dubay said he was frustrated because he felt the state was not making enough of an effort, "ducking its responsibility" to generate additional revenues or make spending cuts.

    "They are forcing those decisions onto the municipalities, and we also have budget problems," Dubay said.

    "I am really disgusted," Dubay said, because the state is not passing along the utility franchise taxes, which are based on contracts between the towns and the utilities, with the state only acting as a collection agency. "They say, 'We need it more than you.'"

    The overall loss of revenue because of the ailing national economy is affecting all town revenues. Aileen Staples, the Wake Forest finance director, noted in January that the town was making less than 2 percent on its investments, substantially less than in the recent past. "We are taking a major hit on our interest estimates this year," she said.

    Officials in all four local towns say they have been conservative in estimating revenues for this year's budget and will slow down spending and delay capital purchases.

    In Franklinton, Morton said one strategy will be to encourage the county, which collects its property taxes, to improve the current collection rate of 93-94 percent.

    "So far we've been lucky enough to have a little surplus," Robbins said in Youngsville. "We're just going to have to cut every corner we can." The town collects its own taxes and has an enviable 97.73 percent collection rate.

    Youngsville has 12 town employees -- two people in town hall, seven officers and one secretary in the police department and two general employees who cut grass, fix waterline breaks and pick up trash. They need a half-time person in town hall and another half-time to help the general employees, Robbins said, but so far the town does not have the money.

    Wake Forest Mayor Vivian Jones, like most mayors across the state, has responded to a call from the state League of Municipalities to write a letter to the governor. The League's executive committee will present those letters when they meet with Easley later this month.

    "We'll just have to keep looking at the budget," Jones said. Jones said town revenues are "below projections because of the economy, but we were conservative in our projections." The town, she said, will probably not be able to do all its planned capital projects.

    —Reprinted by permission of
    The Wake Weekly
    February 14, 2002

    Cartoon of Lenoir County Commissioners trying to hold schools above water.
    Editorial cartoon by Donna Ree
    County commissioners often struggle to finance local services like public schools while dealing with more state mandates and less state funding.

    User Fees

    Local governments charge customers for many of the services they use. These charges are called "user fees." You pay a fee to swim at the public pool or play golf at the public park. You pay a fare to ride on the city bus. Cities and counties with public water supplies and sewer systems charge water and sewer customers based on the amount of water used. Some North Carolina cities also operate the local electric service and charge customers for the electricity they use. These charges are all based on the cost of providing the service. The people who use these services help to pay for the direct benefits they get from them.

    This bus is part of the Charlotte Area Transit System.
    Photo by the City of Charlotte
     
    Bus riders pay only a part of the cost of providing bus service. City and federal tax funds help subsidize bus service. The public benefits from bus ridership through decreased traffic congestion.

     

    In many cases, the users do not pay the entire cost of providing the service, however. Governments subsidize services because the public also benefits from the service. For example, city bus fares are usually heavily subsidized because having people travel on buses reduces the number of cars on the streets. Bus riders reduce traffic congestion and parking problems for those who do drive cars. Bus riders reduce the need for new street and parking construction.

    Local governing boards have the authority to set user fees. Next to the property tax, user fees are the largest source of local government revenue that local officials can control. As local governments have been asked to do more, local officials in many jurisdictions have begun to rely more on user fees to raise the necessary revenue. Fees for collecting solid waste have been established. Fees for building inspections and other regulation have also been increased to cover more of the costs of conducting these regulatory activities.

    Increased reliance on user fees means that more and more of the cost of public service is paid directly by the customer who gets the service. Less is paid as a subsidy from other sources, and so the cost for each user goes up. When the public has a great interest in seeing that everyone gets the service, regardless of ability to pay, user fees are kept low and taxpayers subsidize the cost of the service. User fees set at the full cost of service may mean that public benefits are lost. For example, if bus riders have to pay the full cost of buying and operating the buses, fares may be so high that most riders choose to have their own cars, adding to traffic congestion and the need for more street and parking construction.

    In the News . . .

    Shelby's sewer rates take a hike
    By Luann Laubscher

    Residents will see a 10 percent increase in sewer rates on their February bills.

    City Council voted Monday night to raise rates, beginning Jan. 1 instead of immediately, to avoid customers receiving higher bills right after the holidays.

    "I am reluctant to vote to raise rates," Mayor Mike Philbeck said, "but I see no other way."

    City Manager Grant Goings said that the city staff has proposed more than $600,000 in budget cuts, but that alone will not solve the problem.

    Council members were briefed last week about the state of the utility department's finances following the closing of two major water users, Shelby Dye and Finishing and Doran Mills. The closings created a loss of $322,000 in revenue, with more expected as the economy continues on a downslide.

    Goings said he has been asked why the city can't work like a business and have layoffs during times of financial trouble.

    "The vast majority of our costs are fixed," Goings said. "That explains why - when we lose big users - we have to raise rates to recoup costs."

    Goings said a third of the sewer budget is debt payments and that the workload at the water plant does not decrease.

    "It stays consistent, regardless of the number of gallons of water we sell," he said.

    Another reason the city cannot react like a business, Goings said, is because the city can't go out of business.

    "By law we have to do what is necessary to provide a viable utility," Goings said. "We are not dealing with a profit margin."

    Philbeck said he hoped the city would not have to go through with the other proposed sewer increases.

    —Excerpted by permission of
    The Shelby Star
    December 3, 2001

    State and Federal Aid

    Local governments get some of their revenue from state and federal governments. Grants and other aid programs help local governments meet specific needs. During the 1960s and 1970s, intergovernmental assistance was a major source of local revenue. During the 1980s, many federal grant programs were abolished or greatly reduced and intergovernmental assistance became a much smaller part of local government revenues. Still, several important aid programs remain.

    Community Development Block Grants help cities and counties improve housing, public facilities, and economic opportunities in low income areas. Projects funded under this federal program include installation of water and sewer lines, street paving, housing rehabilitation, and other community improvements.

    Many social service benefits, such as Temporary Assistance to Needy Families, Medicaid, and Food Stamps are paid largely with federal funds. State grants also help to pay for some of the costs of social service programs. Local employees administer these programs. They determine who is eligible and see that appropriate benefits get to those who qualify. Counties also get some federal and state funds to help pay these administrative costs for social service programs, although most of the administrative costs must be paid from county funds.

    State and federal funds are also provided to counties to support health and mental health services. A complex set of programs and regulations governs how these funds are used.

    Other Local Revenues

    When a city or county extends water and sewer lines to new areas, the owners of the property getting the new lines typically pay the local government a special assessment. The assessment helps cover the cost of constructing the new lines. Having public water supplies and sewer service available to the property increases its market value, so the owner is charged for the improvement. Similarly, cities usually charge property owners along a street for paving the street or installing sidewalks along it.

    Interest earned on the fund balance can be another important revenue source. Most local governments try to maintain a fund balance equal to 15 to 20 percent of annual expenditures. This provides a ready source of funding for months when tax collections are slow. A sizable fund balance can also help cover an unexpected decrease in revenues. (Remember, local officials have little control over most of their revenues and cannot change the property tax rate once it is adopted with the annual budget.) Until the funds are needed, the fund balance can be invested and the interest added to government revenues.

    For most municipalities, utility user fees are the biggest source of revenue. Property taxes are the county's largest source of revenue. Figures 7.3 and 7.4 show the various sources for FY 2001 municipal and county revenues.

    Figure 7.3  Total Revenues for North Carolina's Municipalities - Fiscal Year 2000-2001

    Pie chart of municipal revenues

    Total revenues: $7,206,419,619

    Utility user fees (33%) include customers' payments for water and sewer services. Cities with their own electric or gas utilities also collect considerable utility user-fee revenue from the customers of those services.
    Other user fees (6%) includes fees for trash collections, inspections, and other services to customers.
    Property tax (18%)
    Sales tax(8%)
    Other governments (13%) includes payments from federal, state, and other local governments. Payments from the state of North Carolina made up most of this.
    Debt proceeds (11%) are the funds raised through borrowing.
    Other (11%) includes interest earned on municipal fund balances, sale of municipal property, and other miscellaneous revenues.
    (Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.)

    Source:  North Carolina Department of the State Treasurer

    Figure 7.4  Total Revenues for North Carolina's Counties - Fiscal Year 2000-2001

    Pie chart of county revenues

    Total revenues: $9,671,338,222

    Property tax (35%)
    Other taxes (3%)
    Sales tax (12%)
    User fees (9%) includes fire protection charges, landfill charges, ambulance and rescue service charges, cemetery charges, patients' reimbursements and fees, and all other services to customers for which fees are charged.
    Other governments (24%) includes payments from federal, state, and other local governments.
    Debt proceeds (12%) are the funds raised through borrowing.
    Other (5%) includes licenses and permit charges, interest on county fund balances, and sale of county property.
    (Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding.)

    Source:  North Carolina Department of the State Treasurer

    REPORT TO THE PEOPLE

    At the end of each fiscal year, every local government in North Carolina prepares an annual financial report. This document summarizes all of the government's financial activity: what it has received, what it has borrowed, what it has spent, what it is obligated to spend, and what it has in the fund balance. Each local government publishes its annual financial report, has it audited by an independent accounting firm, and files a financial summary with the Local Government Commission.

    Preparation of the report helps local officials better understand the financial situation of their government. The independent audit and the report to the Local Government Commission serve as checks on the accuracy of the report and the legality of the government's financial dealings. And the publication of the report informs citizens about their local government's financial condition.


    DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

    1. Why is the annual budget important to each local government in North Carolina?
    1. Why do local governments try to maintain a sizable fund balance?
    1. How do user fees differ from taxes?
    • What are the advantages of user fees as local government revenues?
    • What are the disadvantages?
    1. Get a copy of the annual budget for your county or city. How much did that government spend last year?
    • How much did it receive?
    • How large was its fund balance?
    1. What are the local property tax rates for your county and city?
    • What are the total assessed values for each of those local governments?
    • How much additional revenue would an increase of one cent in the property tax generate for each?

    Local Government in North Carolina, Second Edition- Chapter 7, Paying for Local Government.
    Copyright © 2003 by Gordon P. Whitaker and the North Carolina City and County Management Association.